| 1 | Confirm the applicable standard and transformer details. | Specify IEC 60076-5, transformer rating, voltage ratio, winding connection, frequency, and required short-circuit duration. | A project-specific datasheet and a written statement identifying the standard edition and agreed requirements. | The purchase specification and manufacturer’s assessment use the same configuration and stated fault conditions. |
| 2 | Check the prospective fault current at the transformer terminals. | Example only: for a 1 MVA, 11/0.415 kV transformer with 6% impedance, the idealized LV terminal fault estimate is about 23.2 kA symmetrical RMS, assuming a stiff upstream source and neglecting other impedances. | The short-circuit calculation, including system source impedance, cable or bus impedance, and the impedance tolerance used. | The calculated fault level reflects the actual installation; the simplified example is not used as a final design value. |
| 3 | Verify the short-circuit current and duration used for assessment. | Thermal stress depends on current and duration; for a given current, the heating effect is related to the current-squared time integral (I²t). | The specified fault current, duration, fault type, and calculation assumptions for each relevant winding. | The assessment covers the project’s protection-clearing time and any agreed backup-protection duration. |
| 4 | Review both thermal and mechanical withstand. | Thermal checks address conductor heating; dynamic checks address electromagnetic forces on windings and supporting structures. Peak current depends on system conditions, including the X/R ratio. | The manufacturer’s IEC 60076-5 assessment identifying the methods and assumptions used for thermal and dynamic withstand. | Both effects are addressed; a thermal calculation alone is not presented as proof of mechanical withstand. |
| 5 | Check impedance and its tolerance against the system study. | In the simplified example, 6% impedance gives an estimated fault level of about 1/0.06, or 16.7 times rated current, before accounting for upstream impedance and other system effects. | Guaranteed impedance, permitted tolerance, and the fault-current calculation using the applicable impedance value. | The design remains suitable at the relevant impedance condition, including the case that produces the higher fault duty. |
| 6 | Confirm that short-circuit evidence matches the offered design. | Evidence may include an applicable short-circuit test report, design calculations, or other verification accepted for the project and standard requirements. | Traceable documentation showing the tested or assessed rating, voltage ratio, winding arrangement, impedance, and relevant design features. | Evidence is technically relevant to the offered transformer; differences from the referenced design are explained and assessed. |
| 7 | Align protection settings and installation conditions. | Compare the transformer withstand assumptions with relay clearing times, breaker operating times, system fault levels, and the intended grounding arrangement. | Protection coordination study, relay and breaker data, and written confirmation of any operating limits relevant to short-circuit duty. | Protection clears faults within the agreed design basis, and site conditions do not exceed the assessed withstand capability. |